Previous
Next

Power ministry working on new norms for discoms to secure payment to gencos Jun 24, 2019

Posted On : July 09, 2019

NEW DELHI: Distribution companies (discoms) will no longer be able to get away without paying for the power they procure for supplying to consumers. The power ministry is ushering in a payment security mechanism on the principles of the pre-paid system to ensure prompt payment to generation companies (gencos).

This is part of structural changes being implemented by power minister R K Singh to address issues facing the sector and attract investments needed for improving quality of life with reliable and sustainable electricity supply.

“We have to find lasting solutions (to issues). How long can this system carry on where we have to remonetise discoms, only for them to be back to square one a few years later. The new mechanism will force discoms to improve billing and collection as well as overall efficiency,” power minister R K Singh told TOI.

A mounting pile of gencos’ unpaid bills has caused financial stress to many power projects, forcing some even to the brink of bankruptcy. The ministry’s PRAAPTI portal pegs generators’ total outstanding amount at Rs 35,845 crore at the end of April.

Under the new mechanism, discoms will have to furnish LCs (letters of credit) to ‘load despatch centres’ before power from generation companies is allowed to flow to states. The despatch centres will limit the flow of power to the quantum covered by the LCs provided.

Load despatch centres are nodal control points – akin to large railway junctions – that function at the national, regional and state levels to facilitate smooth and safe flow of power within and across states.

The ministry is expected to issue an order for the new mechanism within a week. The order is building upon the provision of LCs that exist in power purchase agreements but are followed erratically or not at all. The ministry order will empower the despatch centres to follow the PPA provision and cut supply.

“States must pay for power for sustainable supply. Under the new system, if they don’t pay then supply will be cut off and there will be blackout which will have political cost as it makes people unhappy as the country is power surplus. There will be financial cost as well as we are going to put in place a legal framework to punish discoms for willful blackouts,” Singh said.

    

Other News

  1. Uday scheme: Modi government may miss target due to states’ non-compliance Jan 11, 2019
  2. Power tariffs set to rise by 20 per cent in Uttar Pradesh Jun 16, 2019
  3. All India Power Engineers Federation on Tuesday condemned the central government''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy "to facilitate privatisation". According to a statement by the AIPEF, the proposed changes require extensive discussions as such time for submission of comments should be six months. When fundamental changes are being introduced by way of privatization of the power sector, there is no basis to rush through more so under extreme distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it said. "All India Power Engineers Federation (AIPEF) condemns the government of India''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy to facilitate the privatization of the power sector," the statement said. The body alleged that this is a clear attempt to introduce privatization through the backdoor and deserves to be scrapped. The purpose of the central government is not to review or revise the existing National Electricity Policy but the total replacement of existing policy with a new policy to be recommended by the expert group so as to achieve privatization, the body alleged. As per Electricity Act 2003, National Electricity Policy is to be prepared in consultation with the state governments and Central Electricity Authority (CEA), a statutory body. However, the body said that the CEA is not included in the proposed schedule of discussion. Further, only 5 states have been included in an expert group instead of all the states, it added. K Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, has stated that India is the only country that readily implemented a slew of reforms and used this crisis to herald a change in India''s economic thinking, it said. The strategy of government seems to be “never waste a crisis” and use the crisis of pandemic to streamroll so-called reforms by way of privatizing, it alleged. The draft proposal is of serious nature for which the present situation of a pandemic is a serious constraint, it stated. The Ministry of Power has once again found peak pandemic time as an opportunity in crisis to launch the draft amendments to National Electricity Policy, it lamented. Once the draft policy is finalised, the notified policy would have the status of “subordinate legislation”, and for this reason, the matters need to deliberate as in the case of the legislation itself or as in the case of amendment in the Act itself, it opined. Draft national electricity policy is pushing for more private participation in the power sector and launching sell out of public assets as at Chandigarh and Dadra Nagar Haveli, it noted. The preferred route being suggested are failed models like the franchisee system, transferring distribution responsibility to a private party, and separation of carriage (lines) and content (supply) business, it opined. Since the existing Policy is in force since February 2005 there was no emergency to totally replace it, while power engineers and workers as front line workers are already stressed in maintaining power continuity, it added All India Power Engineers Federation on Tuesday condemned the central government''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy "to facilitate privatisation". According to a statement by the AIPEF, the proposed changes require extensive discussions as such time for submission of comments should be six months. When fundamental changes are being introduced by way of privatization of the power sector, there is no basis to rush through more so under extreme distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it said. "All India Power Engineers Federation (AIPEF) condemns the government of India''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy to facilitate the privatization of the power sector," the statement said. The body alleged that this is a clear attempt to introduce privatization through the backdoor and deserves to be scrapped. The purpose of the central government is not to review or revise the existing National Electricity Policy but the total replacement of existing policy with a new policy to be recommended by the expert group so as to achieve privatization, the body alleged. As per Electricity Act 2003, National Electricity Policy is to be prepared in consultation with the state governments and Central Electricity Authority (CEA), a statutory body. However, the body said that the CEA is not included in the proposed schedule of discussion. Further, only 5 states have been included in an expert group instead of all the states, it added. K Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, has stated that India is the only country that readily implemented a slew of reforms and used this crisis to herald a change in India''s economic thinking, it said. The strategy of government seems to be “never waste a crisis” and use the crisis of pandemic to streamroll so-called reforms by way of privatizing, it alleged. The draft proposal is of serious nature for which the present situation of a pandemic is a serious constraint, it stated. The Ministry of Power has once again found peak pandemic time as an opportunity in crisis to launch the draft amendments to National Electricity Policy, it lamented. Once the draft policy is finalised, the notified policy would have the status of “subordinate legislation”, and for this reason, the matters need to deliberate as in the case of the legislation itself or as in the case of amendment in the Act itself, it opined. Draft national electricity policy is pushing for more private participation in the power sector and launching sell out of public assets as at Chandigarh and Dadra Nagar Haveli, it noted. The preferred route being suggested are failed models like the franchisee system, transferring distribution responsibility to a private party, and separation of carriage (lines) and content (supply) business, it opined. Since the existing Policy is in force since February 2005 there was no emergency to totally replace it, while power engineers and workers as front line workers are already stressed in maintaining power continuity, it added
  4. BBMB incurs ?100 crore loss due to delay in power unit repair, starts probe Jul 26, 2021
  5. ALL INDIA POWER ENGINEERS FEDERATION 01 April 2019