Previous
Next

Multi-crore purchase scam: PSPCL report indicts ex-chief engineer, other officials

Posted On : August 25, 2018

PATIALA:An inquiry into the multi-crore purchase scam in the centrally sponsored schemes of the Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd has indicted a former chief engineer and other senior officials, hinting that it might just be the tip of the iceberg and the probe may lead to the top brass of the corporation, including a director.

An HT report on the fraud in the centrally sponsored integrated power development scheme (IPDS) and Deen Dyal Upadya Gram Jyoti Yojna (DDUGJY) executed by the chief engineer (accelerated power development and reforms programme) under the PSPCL’s distribution wing had forced the corporation to expeditiously complete the inquiry.

A probe was ordered into the alleged overpayment for electricity meters between 2013 and 2017, causing a loss of ?16 crore to the corporation.

Additional chief secretary (power) Satish Chandra had asked the PSPCL technical audit wing to submit a report in 15 days. The Centre’s Power Finance Corporation central vigilance officer has sought a report from the state.

As per reports, the technical audit wing completed a stage of inquiry in which allegations highlighted by HT have been found to be true.

Additional superintending engineer Inderjit Singh and accounts officer Jagjivan Singh in PSPCL’s accelerated power development and reforms programme (APDRP) office have been placed under suspension.

It has been decided to take action against retired chief engineer Balbir Singh Sidhu, under whose supervision the scam took place, and retired superintending engineer Anil Soni.

Initially, a three-member committee of engineers sympathetic to those facing inquiry was constituted to hush up the matter, it was claimed.

The additional chief secretary (power) then entrusted the inquiry to the tech audit wing, disbanding the three-member committee.

The complainant had said PSPCL’s whole-time directors had approved the purchase of 131 meters at ?800 each for installing on transformers and 2.54 lakh meters at ? 468 each for consumers.

But the office of chief engineer (APDRP) Balbir Singh later changed these rates and allowed ?800 each for the 2.54 lakh consumer meters, leading to an extra payment of ?12 crore under the Gram Jyoti Yojana (rural electrification scheme), it was alleged.

Also, an excess payment of ?4 crore was made under another scheme for such meters.

Earlier, it was also highlighted in the press that more than ?450 crore was splurged by paying higher rates under a scheme for improving the power distribution system in Punjab.

 

Other News

  1. All India Power Engineers Federation on Tuesday condemned the central government''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy "to facilitate privatisation". According to a statement by the AIPEF, the proposed changes require extensive discussions as such time for submission of comments should be six months. When fundamental changes are being introduced by way of privatization of the power sector, there is no basis to rush through more so under extreme distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it said. "All India Power Engineers Federation (AIPEF) condemns the government of India''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy to facilitate the privatization of the power sector," the statement said. The body alleged that this is a clear attempt to introduce privatization through the backdoor and deserves to be scrapped. The purpose of the central government is not to review or revise the existing National Electricity Policy but the total replacement of existing policy with a new policy to be recommended by the expert group so as to achieve privatization, the body alleged. As per Electricity Act 2003, National Electricity Policy is to be prepared in consultation with the state governments and Central Electricity Authority (CEA), a statutory body. However, the body said that the CEA is not included in the proposed schedule of discussion. Further, only 5 states have been included in an expert group instead of all the states, it added. K Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, has stated that India is the only country that readily implemented a slew of reforms and used this crisis to herald a change in India''s economic thinking, it said. The strategy of government seems to be “never waste a crisis” and use the crisis of pandemic to streamroll so-called reforms by way of privatizing, it alleged. The draft proposal is of serious nature for which the present situation of a pandemic is a serious constraint, it stated. The Ministry of Power has once again found peak pandemic time as an opportunity in crisis to launch the draft amendments to National Electricity Policy, it lamented. Once the draft policy is finalised, the notified policy would have the status of “subordinate legislation”, and for this reason, the matters need to deliberate as in the case of the legislation itself or as in the case of amendment in the Act itself, it opined. Draft national electricity policy is pushing for more private participation in the power sector and launching sell out of public assets as at Chandigarh and Dadra Nagar Haveli, it noted. The preferred route being suggested are failed models like the franchisee system, transferring distribution responsibility to a private party, and separation of carriage (lines) and content (supply) business, it opined. Since the existing Policy is in force since February 2005 there was no emergency to totally replace it, while power engineers and workers as front line workers are already stressed in maintaining power continuity, it added All India Power Engineers Federation on Tuesday condemned the central government''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy "to facilitate privatisation". According to a statement by the AIPEF, the proposed changes require extensive discussions as such time for submission of comments should be six months. When fundamental changes are being introduced by way of privatization of the power sector, there is no basis to rush through more so under extreme distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it said. "All India Power Engineers Federation (AIPEF) condemns the government of India''s move to amend the National Electricity Policy to facilitate the privatization of the power sector," the statement said. The body alleged that this is a clear attempt to introduce privatization through the backdoor and deserves to be scrapped. The purpose of the central government is not to review or revise the existing National Electricity Policy but the total replacement of existing policy with a new policy to be recommended by the expert group so as to achieve privatization, the body alleged. As per Electricity Act 2003, National Electricity Policy is to be prepared in consultation with the state governments and Central Electricity Authority (CEA), a statutory body. However, the body said that the CEA is not included in the proposed schedule of discussion. Further, only 5 states have been included in an expert group instead of all the states, it added. K Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, has stated that India is the only country that readily implemented a slew of reforms and used this crisis to herald a change in India''s economic thinking, it said. The strategy of government seems to be “never waste a crisis” and use the crisis of pandemic to streamroll so-called reforms by way of privatizing, it alleged. The draft proposal is of serious nature for which the present situation of a pandemic is a serious constraint, it stated. The Ministry of Power has once again found peak pandemic time as an opportunity in crisis to launch the draft amendments to National Electricity Policy, it lamented. Once the draft policy is finalised, the notified policy would have the status of “subordinate legislation”, and for this reason, the matters need to deliberate as in the case of the legislation itself or as in the case of amendment in the Act itself, it opined. Draft national electricity policy is pushing for more private participation in the power sector and launching sell out of public assets as at Chandigarh and Dadra Nagar Haveli, it noted. The preferred route being suggested are failed models like the franchisee system, transferring distribution responsibility to a private party, and separation of carriage (lines) and content (supply) business, it opined. Since the existing Policy is in force since February 2005 there was no emergency to totally replace it, while power engineers and workers as front line workers are already stressed in maintaining power continuity, it added
  2. Punjab Assembly unanimously passes 3 Bills to counter Centre’s farm laws, Oct 21, 2020
  3. Thermal power projects with investments worth over Rs 2.5 lakh crore facing stress Feb 11,2019
  4. Proposed draft amendments to Electricity Act 2003, Jul 17, 2020
  5. Kerala: KSEB to sign power purchase pact with private firm today Jun 19, 2019